Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 12 - Jul 17
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Fujifilm GF 63mm f/2.8 R WR LensFujifilm G Mount 50mm (35mm Equivalent) Aperture Range: f 2. 8 to f 32 One Extra Low Dispersion Element Fluorine Coated Front Element Dust and Weather Sealed Construction Command Position on Aperture Ring Rounded Nine Blade Diaphragm A sleek and versatile normal length prime, the GF 63mm f 2. 8 R WR from Fujifilm is a 50mm equivalent lens for the G mount GFX camera system. Its 10 elements, eight groups optical design incorporates one extra low
- Fujifilm G Mount
- 50mm (35mm Equivalent)
- Aperture Range: f/2.8 to f/32
- One Extra-Low Dispersion Element
- Fluorine-Coated Front Element
- Dust- and Weather-Sealed Construction
- Command Position on Aperture Ring
- Rounded Nine-Blade Diaphragm
A sleek and versatile normal-length prime, the GF 63mm f/2.8 R WR from Fujifilm is a 50mm equivalent lens for the G-mount GFX camera system. Its 10 elements, eight groups optical design incorporates one extra-low dispersion element to reduce chromatic aberrations and color fringing for improved clarity and color accuracy throughout the aperture range. A fluorine coating has also been added to the front element to repel moisture and the lens also features a dust-, freeze-, and weather-resistant construction for use in inclement conditions. Additionally, a manual aperture ring is featured for intuitive, tactile adjustment over exposure settings, and a Command position can also be set for camera-based control over the aperture.
- Standard-length prime lens offers a 50mm equivalent focal length to realize a normal field of view for working with a variety of subjects.
- Bright f/2.8 maximum aperture benefits working in low-light conditions as well as enables a high degree of control over depth of field.
- The optical design incorporates one extra-low dispersion element to reduce chromatic aberrations and color fringing throughout the aperture and focusing ranges for notable clarity and color fidelity.
- The front optical group is used for focusing to minimize aberrations and distortions throughout the focusing range.
- Physical aperture ring allows for intuitive adjustment over exposure settings, and incorporates a C (Command) position to permit camera-based aperture setting.
- The front element features a hydrophobic fluorine coating to repel moisture.
- Dust- and weather-sealed physical construction enables working in harsh climates and temperatures as low as 14°F.
- Rounded nine-blade diaphragm contributes to a pleasing bokeh quality.
| Focal Length | 63 mm |
| Aperture | Maximum: f/2.8 Minimum: f/32 |
| Camera Mount | Fujifilm G |
| Angle of View @ Infinity | 46.9° |
| Minimum Focus Distance | 1.64' (50 cm) |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 |
| Elements/Groups | 10/8 |
| Magnification | 0.17x |
| Flange Focal Distance | 26.7 mm |
| Autofocus | Yes |
| Filter Thread | Front: 62 mm |
| Weight | 14.29 oz (405 g) |
| Dimensions | Approx. 3.31 x 2.80" (84 x 71 mm) |
In the Box
Fujifilm GF 63mm f/2.8 R WR Lens
- FLCP-62II 62mm Lens Cap
- RLCP-002 Rear Lens Cap
- Lens Hood
- Lens Case
- Limited 1-Year Warranty
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.0 ★★★★★
Based on 2014 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 1
Way too small with very little stretch.
I ordered a size 4X to make sure they were loose enough. The ones I received are like a size 8 very small.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 1, 2026
★★★★★ 1
Small Fit equals NO fit
These items are way too small. Can I return them?
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 2, 2026
★★★★★ 1
Small
These run very small.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 21, 2025
★★★★★ 5
If you haven't switched to boxer briefs, you're missing out :)
Size: 11 Plus, Color: Microfiber - Colors May Vary
I figured I ought to provide a review, something I'm not prone to doing even though I often/always bank my purchases on item reviews, since I just bought me a second set of these underwear because they're just that good!
I bought my 1st set of these 2 months ago because I was on the hunt for some new comfortable underwear and omfort was my main criteria. Wasn't aware that I was dealing with some health issues that was causing a fair bit of internal inflammation, just knew that I had had enough of basically everything I had at the time because they were old, ratty looking and even my all-time favorites had begun feeling too... something... not exactly too tight, yet they just weren't very comfortable anymore either and I didn't need that kind of extra stress in my life. But. I'm a barely-makin-it domestic violence survivor.
Sure, I'm super proud to have gotten as far as I have in this world (considering that post-separation psychological terrorism and torture continue to thus day, 5 years after I broke free) but, by rights and family-rearing, I should be living in a whole different world right now... which is my way of saying that money is extra, EXTRA tight in my house...and yet, I still have "caviar tastes", ifykwim. Lol. And, frankly, neither I nor anyone else should have to scrimp on comfortable, classy-feeling, fashionable clothing no matter how small our clothing budget may be.
I was spurred to check out boxer briefs for women after reading about a few different women's favorite brands in the comments on soneones IG post (that must have been in regards to underwear, but heck if I can remember the details). So, off I went to scout around on Amazon to see what this "boxer briefs" business was about... desperately hoping that the term was not just a rebranding of those "hipsters" things.
I am 46yo, 5'10" (potentially closer to 5'11"... not something I care enough about to know for certain, lol) and, clothing size-wise, my whole adult life I have consistently been a 16-18/18-20, top to bottom, with a shape that seems some what apple-ish at the moment but has, in general, always been more hourglass than apple. Also it seems as if I might have rather freakishly high hips, lol... not really, but for reference, when it comes to pants or jeans what generally passes as "tall", usually a 33"-34" inseem, fit like ankle or cigar length pants on me. But evidently I don't just have long legs, no, this momma's body seems to also have one heck of a long, tall pelvis which I did finally measure to figure out for sure but, prior to that, I could tell based on the way that low cut underwear like bikini & hipsters, and any form of low rise pants, barely make it north of my low lying c-section scar location which, for those who can't relate, is basically at the top of my hooha or just at the point where my belly and my hooha meet. And because that point on my body is not even remotely close to my "hip" area such items basically fall right off my body unless they're super stretchy and I deliberately hike them up to my hip area which I put up with in my 20s and 30s, for the sake of fashion I suppose, but which was and is quite ungodly uncomfortable, and... basically... I am so over with "uncomfortable" anything (men included, lol.)
In both cases I bought size 11, though, if I'm being honest, I am certain that a 10 would have fit well, too. And who knows, a 10 might have been just as comfortable or even more comfortable than the 11... but, I didn't take bother taking the chance to find out when I ordered my second set because the first set (size 11) made me so unbelievably happy that they literally changed my views about underwear for life.
This whole "pants come off after work" thing or the memes about people working from home (due to covid restrictions) and not wearing pants never jived with me prior to having these boxer briefs, but now... omg... these things are super inexpensive and somehow still suit my somewhat "caviar taste" perfectly (have a good handfeel and are just so unbelievably super comfortable), PLUS... they're opaque and they basically fit (and look) like I'm wearing a loungy pair of bike shorts, so... yeah, I've spent some time over the last 2 months actually chillin in my house in my freaking underwear!!!!
Life. Changing. :D
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 7, 2022
★★★★★ 5
Soft and comfy
Size: 12 Plus, Color: Microfiber - Colors May Vary
Comfortable fit. Have bought 4 times.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 30, 2026