![DIXCEL DISC ROTOR TYPE PD 1128213S-PD [Compatibility List in Desc.]](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0644/3486/4197/files/main_ph_pd_d1fe0941-722a-4de0-88bb-fd22294fd42a.jpg?v=1742327053)
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 12 - Jul 17
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
DIXCEL DISC ROTOR TYPE PD 1128213S-PD [Compatibility List in Desc.]Brand DIXCEL Product Number 1128213S PD Product Description Model Grade:! ML350 4MATIC _x000D_ _x000D_ PD type _x000D_ The standard brake disc with increased corrosion protection _x000D_ On top of our usual product quality standards (product precision, surface hardness, and material composition [the ratio of materials like carbon and silicon]), we applied the DIXCEL anti corrosion standard. _x000D_ All of our brake discs come with anti corrosion
| Brand | DIXCEL |
| Product Number | 1128213S-PD |
| Product Description | Model Grade:! ML350 4MATIC _x000D_ _x000D_ PD type _x000D_ The standard brake disc with increased corrosion protection _x000D_ On top of our usual product quality standards (product precision, surface hardness, and material composition [the ratio of materials like carbon and silicon]), we applied the DIXCEL anti-corrosion standard. _x000D_ All of our brake discs come with anti-corrosion coating, something other manufacturers and OEM suppliers were not able to do, at a reasonable price . (Except on some truck applications) _x000D_ In terms of precision, we set a strict manufacturing standard which helped us achieve reductions in both noise level and vibrations. _x000D_ Improvements in durability,crack resistance and heat resistance were achieved by using a precise mixture of additives in the disc material. _x000D_ Available for a wide range of vehicles _x000D_ Better quality, and more reasonably priced compared to the OEM replacement. Compatible Vehicles: MERCEDES BENZ W166 166057 12/06 ~ 15/10 MERCEDES BENZ W166 166057 12/06 ~ 15/10 MERCEDES BENZ W166 166064 15/10 ~ MERCEDES BENZ X166 166824 16 / 04 ~ MERCEDES BENZ X166 166873 13/04 ~ 16/04 MERCEDES BENZ X166 166873 13/04 ~ 16/04 MERCEDES BENZ X166 166873 16/04 ~ br> MERCEDES BENZ W166 166057 12/06 ~ 15/10 MERCEDES BENZ W166 166064 15/10 ~ MERCEDES BENZ X166 166824 16/04 ~ MERCEDES BENZ X166 166873 13/04 ~ 16/04 < br> MERCEDES BENZ X166 166873 13/04 ~ 16/04 MERCEDES BENZ X166 166873 16/04 ~ br> MERCEDES BENZ W166 166057 12/06 ~ 15/10 MERCEDES BENZ W166 166064 15/10 ~ MERCEDES BENZ X166 166824 16/04 ~ MERCEDES BENZ X166 166873 13/04 ~ 16/04 < br> MERCEDES BENZ X166 166873 13/04 ~ 16/04 MERCEDES BENZ X166 166873 16/04 ~ |
| Remarks | In AMG Sport Package · chassis No → A174198 _x000D_ This package, which has been processing such as slits or dimple is not in the "Made in our company". _x000D_ their "secondary processed products" will be our warranty. _x000D_ rotor is an image. Shape is the same shape and the normal (genuine) products. MERCEDES BENZ W166 166057 12/06 ~ 15/10: AMG Sport Package · chassis No → A174198 MERCEDES BENZ W166 166057 12/06 ~ 15/10: AMG Sport Package · chassis NoA174199 → MERCEDES BENZ W166 166064 15/10 ~: here of the package, what is the processing such as slits or dimple is not in the "made in our company". MERCEDES BENZ X166 166824 16/04 ~: here of the package, what is the processing such as slits or dimple is not in the "Made in our company". MERCEDES BENZ X166 166873 13/04 ~ 16/04: chassis No → A174198 MERCEDES BENZ X166 166873 13/04 ~ 16/04: chassis NoA174199 → MERCEDES BENZ X166 166873 16/04 ~: here of the package, what is the processing such as slits or dimple is not in the "made in our company". |
| Notes | Images are for illustration purpose only. Actual product may vary. |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 1350 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
Cute but could use some pockets
Special Size: 6" Inseam Contrast Trim without Pockets, Size: Small, Color: Navy/White
Obsessed with these shorts. They are so cute and comfy. They fit true to size and I love that there is a matching top you can buy separately. I feel like the material is pretty thick and I don't have to worry about it being see through. My only complaint is that there are no pockets.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 2, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Perfect workout shorts!
Special Size: 5" Inseam without Pockets, Size: Medium, Color: Black
Very comfortable and soft material. Great price! Perfect for workouts! Doesn't ride up or have constant pulling on them!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 19, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Nice fabric
Special Size: 7" Inseam with Pockets, Size: X-Large, Color: Taupe
These are well made. The fabric is perfect! Not thin. I was disappointed that I ordered a size that was too large. I had to return. I need to get updated body measurements before reordering.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 17, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Buy buy buy!!!!
Special Size: 7" Inseam with Pockets, Size: Large, Color: Taupe
Fantastic! I got These a while back k in another color and needed another pair. I got the green, can you say wow! This color is beautiful and bright! They are as comfortable as my other ones! Worth every dime!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 5, 2026
★★★★★ 5
My favorite pair
Special Size: 7" Inseam with Pockets, Size: Large, Color: Black
The most comfortable pair of shorts I own. Material is soft, pockets are the perfect size.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 30, 2026