Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 15 - Jul 20
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
MCP1600-C002 NVIDIA Mellanox® Compatible Direct Attach Copper Cable QSFP28 100GBase-CU (Passive Twinax, 2m)MCP1600 C002 NVIDIA Mellanox Compatible Direct Attach Copper Cable QSFP28 100GBase CU (Passive Twinax, 2m) ATGBICS NVIDIA Mellanox Compatible MCP1600 C002 100GBase CU QSFP28 to QSFP28 Passive Direct Attach Cable operates over Passive Copper with a cable length of 2m. This product operates within a commercial temperature range. It is suitable for short reach connection between two QSFP28 ports in 100G interconnecting networking applications. Our
MCP1600-C002 NVIDIA Mellanox® Compatible Direct Attach Copper Cable QSFP28 100GBase-CU (Passive Twinax, 2m)
ATGBICS NVIDIA Mellanox® Compatible MCP1600-C002 100GBase-CU QSFP28 to QSFP28 Passive Direct Attach Cable operates over Passive Copper with a cable length of 2m. This product operates within a commercial temperature range. It is suitable for short reach connection between two QSFP28 ports in 100G interconnecting networking applications.
Our product meets the specification of NVIDIA Mellanox®MCP1600-C002 and we proudly offer a compatibility guarantee and limited lifetime warranty. Our rigorously tested products record a unique traceable serial number and are fully compliant with all MSA (Multi-Source Agreement) and IEEE standards & protocols.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 165 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Useful, simple room divider
Color: White, Size: 4 Panel Basic
All the pieces were accounted for, and some even had extra pieces, maybe just in case they need changing. It was a bit like putting together a piece of IKEA furniture, though I went slower than usual so as not to make any mistakes. It wasn’t too hard to put together myself, and helps give my studio apt a feeling of space and privacy for my bed. I only wish it had a lovely Japanese design on it, but it does amazingly seem to match the wall color.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 3, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Multi purpose divider
Color: White, Size: 4 Panel Basic
I am excited this divider is being used to block off a portion of the dining room where I stored extra supplies. It looks nice!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 1, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Divisor practico
Color: Black, Size: 4 Panel Basic
Lo uso para dividir la sala de la cocina en mi prqueño departamento excelente 👌
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 31, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Buenas
Color: White, Size: 4 Panel Basic
Utilizamos estas divisiones por largo tiempo y las tiramos enteras y en perfecto estado . Muy buenas
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Beautiful room dividers! I'm glad I bought several.
Color: Light Beige, Size: 6-Panel
This room divider is perfect for my use. I bought one with 6 panels and another with 4 panels, mostly to hide areas of my living space when guests come over. The screens are attractive, a pleasing color, just the right height and width, and a very pretty design. They require no assembly and are easy to put in place. When not in use, they store in a compact fashion.
The only drawback is the odor from the manufacturing process. I left the screens on an enclosed porch with the windows open for about two weeks before I could tolerate the odor inside the house. After that, there was no problem.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2026